It's not good if for every 12 you put in, only 3 are approved. So we're at 10 days for 3 approved missions, now re-submit the other 9. 20 days later, we have....7 approved. Lets try the last 5. Now we're at a month, except none of them are approved, so we'll try doing something else since we're actually not sure the real reasons for the rejections. Okay, 40 days, 4 made it through, we still have one left for a simple 12 mission banner.
You see where I'm going. 10 days is fine if they all make it through on the first go....
One of the reformulations in addition to the reason to be denied, in a resubmission could be placed in front of others to be faster, helping us in this question that you said.
I would be in favor of this if it rewarded banner creators with one point per banner rather than per mission. Otherwise it's another badge that gives credits for tiny little pieces rather than one whole, just like specops.
God no. This would both increase crappy missions, and be instantly black for most creators because they've already capped their accounts.
And if you're going to suggest that people have to delete old missions and make new ones, that's even worse because it encourages people to reduce the number of available missions.
Comments
I'm sure the mission reviewers look forward to the flood of missions that would create.
Waited 8 days for my last round of rejections, that's too long as it is.
Maybe after a revamp of the mission creator tool and reviewing in general, we can talk medals...
I can only agree with this if the points are given by each new agent completing one of someone elses mission, not by just creating one.
I agree that a redesign is needed in the tool. Mainly the reason for refusal, but a deadline of up to 10 days for a response, I consider it good.
It's not good if for every 12 you put in, only 3 are approved. So we're at 10 days for 3 approved missions, now re-submit the other 9. 20 days later, we have....7 approved. Lets try the last 5. Now we're at a month, except none of them are approved, so we'll try doing something else since we're actually not sure the real reasons for the rejections. Okay, 40 days, 4 made it through, we still have one left for a simple 12 mission banner.
You see where I'm going. 10 days is fine if they all make it through on the first go....
Absolutely no for medal.
One of the reformulations in addition to the reason to be denied, in a resubmission could be placed in front of others to be faster, helping us in this question that you said.
I would be in favor of this if it rewarded banner creators with one point per banner rather than per mission. Otherwise it's another badge that gives credits for tiny little pieces rather than one whole, just like specops.
As someone who's published 50 missions but never made a banner, I find that suggestion positively offensive. How dare you.
The original idea is just foolish, but yours is deranged.
@XK150 How is it deranged to treat banners as single items?
God no. This would both increase crappy missions, and be instantly black for most creators because they've already capped their accounts.
And if you're going to suggest that people have to delete old missions and make new ones, that's even worse because it encourages people to reduce the number of available missions.
i would prefer that they remove or increase the number of allowed mission.
so boring to have to remove some to create new ones
Would you know what mission limit?
180 missions is not enough
small amount 😰